Malcolm Bryant: Exonerated by DNA
On the evening of November 20, 1998, 17-year-old Tyeisha
Powell and 16-year-old Toni Bullock were confronted by a man carrying a knife.
They were dragged into a vacant lot in Baltimore, Maryland and Bullock was
stabbed to death. Powell managed to escape and later gave police a description
of her attacker. She only saw him briefly and other factors such as poor visibility
in the rain and evening made it hard for her to give an adequate description. A
week later with no leads, police receive a phone call from members of the
victim’s family saying a man resembling the sketch was just released from jail.
Bryant was picked up and immediately put in a photo lineup where Powell
identified him as the attacker. Bryant was charged with first-degree murder,
even though witnesses placed him at a nightclub at the time of the crime.
Bryant was sentenced to life in prison in 1999. Over the years, Bryant filed motions
only to be dismissed and until 2009, a petition was granted to test fingernail
clippings. “The testing revealed a partial DNA profile of a male, which had a
rare identifier, which Bryant did not have” (Innocence Project).
It wasn’t until early 2016 that Bryant filed for a new
trial. Based on new findings the charges were dropped and Bryant was
exonerated. Bryant spent 17 years behind prison and died a year after being
released. As unfortunate as Bryant’s case is, there are more just like his. Bryant
was convicted on false identification and exonerated by DNA.
Let’s look a little closer to home (Arizona):
Eyewitness Identification Reform
Arizona has no statewide eyewitness identification reform
policy.
Recording
of Interrogations
Arizona has no state law requiring recorded interrogations.
Post
Conviction DNA Testing
Any person convicted of a felony offense may file a petition
for post- conviction DNA testing
with the court where the conviction occurred.Effective
2000.
Evidence
Preservation
State statute requires
the automatic preservation of all biological evidence related to homicide or
felony sexual offenses for the length of an individual’s incarceration, or
until the completion of their supervised release. Effective 2009.
Arizona's statute does NOT meet the best practices standards outlined by the NIST Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation.
Arizona's statute does NOT meet the best practices standards outlined by the NIST Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation.
Exoneree
Compensation
Arizona has no exoneree
compensation law.
Comments
Post a Comment